Legal Insider: U.S. Women’s Soccer Team Members File Suit for Unequal Pay - 5 minutes read
Legal Insider: U.S. Women's Soccer Team Members File Suit for Unequal Pay
This is a sponsored column by attorneys John Berry and Kimberly Berry of Berry & Berry, PLLC, an employment and labor law firm located in Northern Virginia that specializes in federal employee, security clearance, retirement and private sector employee matters.
In April of 2016, we earlier wrote on the efforts of the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team and their efforts to receive equal pay as compared to the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team.
Much has happened in the past three years to warrant an update. For one, the women’s team has won another World Cup, recently with a 2-0 victory over the Netherlands. For another, national sponsors of soccer (e.g., Procter and Gamble) have begun to join the fight for equal pay on the side of the women’s team. Lastly, the equal pay movement has become stronger over the past three years. Attached is a copy of the original equal pay complaint.
It is an unfortunate fact that the EEOC has taken so long with this case. As mentioned earlier, the case started in early 2016 and originally involved the five team captains of the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team, such as Hope Solo and Carli Lloyd, who filed a wage discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of all members of the women’s team against the U.S. Soccer Federation.
Since the 3-year delay at the EEOC, all 28 women’s team players have withdrawn their EEOC case and filed suit in the federal district court in Los Angeles, alleging that the U.S. Soccer Federation has engaged in several years of institutional gender discrimination. A copy of that complaint is linked.
In the latest filing by plaintiffs Alex Morgan, Megan Rapinoe and other women’s team members, they allege the serious pay discrepancies that continue to exist between the men’s and women’s teams.
Specifically, members of the women’s team can potentially earn a maximum of $99,000 a year, while members of the men’s team earn an average of $263,320 per year. Other disparities include the U.S. Soccer Federation only providing charter air flights to the men’s team in 2017, but requiring the women’s team to take commercial air flights.
The reason why this case is so newsworthy is the fact that the women’s team has been out performing the men’s team in rankings and World Cup wins for a long time. The women’s team has been ranked number one in the world for 10 of the past 11 years. Also, in more recent years, the women’s team has been outperforming the men’s team in revenue and profits as well, and in viewership. For instance, the 2019 Women’s Cup Final viewership was 22% higher than the 2018 Men’s Cup Final.
While the Soccer Federation has claimed market considerations as the reason for paying the men’s team more, the women’s team, according to the complaint, has started to outperform the men’s soccer team in revenue and profit in the most recent accounts. Additionally, according to the complaint, the women’s team had even proposed a revenue-sharing agreement where women’s player compensation would be less if their revenue decreased. It seems as if the U.S. Soccer Federation needs a reality check.
It is time that the U.S. Soccer Federation recognize and pay the women’s team at least the same as their male counterparts on the two national teams and provide them the same benefits. We represent employees in employment matters.
If you need assistance with a federal retirement or an employment issue, please contact our office at (703) 668-0070 or at www.berrylegal.com to schedule a consultation. Please also visit and like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/BerryBerryPllc.
Source: Arlnow.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
United States women's national soccer team • Lawsuit • Lawyer • John Berry (administrator) • Employment • Labour law • Law firm • Northern Virginia • United States federal civil service • Security clearance • Private sector • United States women's national soccer team • United States men's national soccer team • Another World (TV series) • FIFA World Cup • Netherlands • Sponsor (commercial) • Association football • Procter & Gamble • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • Hope Solo • Carli Lloyd • Economic discrimination • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • United States Soccer Federation • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • Case law • Lawsuit • United States district court • Los Angeles • United States Soccer Federation • Sexism • Alex Morgan • Megan Rapinoe • United States women's national soccer team • Soviet submarine S-99 • United States Soccer Federation • FIFA World Cup • IIHF World Ranking • Association football • Association football • Revenue sharing • Contract • United States Soccer Federation • Reality Check (Juvenile album) • United States Soccer Federation • Employee benefits • Employment • Employment • Welfare • Retirement • Employment • Facebook •
This is a sponsored column by attorneys John Berry and Kimberly Berry of Berry & Berry, PLLC, an employment and labor law firm located in Northern Virginia that specializes in federal employee, security clearance, retirement and private sector employee matters.
In April of 2016, we earlier wrote on the efforts of the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team and their efforts to receive equal pay as compared to the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team.
Much has happened in the past three years to warrant an update. For one, the women’s team has won another World Cup, recently with a 2-0 victory over the Netherlands. For another, national sponsors of soccer (e.g., Procter and Gamble) have begun to join the fight for equal pay on the side of the women’s team. Lastly, the equal pay movement has become stronger over the past three years. Attached is a copy of the original equal pay complaint.
It is an unfortunate fact that the EEOC has taken so long with this case. As mentioned earlier, the case started in early 2016 and originally involved the five team captains of the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team, such as Hope Solo and Carli Lloyd, who filed a wage discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of all members of the women’s team against the U.S. Soccer Federation.
Since the 3-year delay at the EEOC, all 28 women’s team players have withdrawn their EEOC case and filed suit in the federal district court in Los Angeles, alleging that the U.S. Soccer Federation has engaged in several years of institutional gender discrimination. A copy of that complaint is linked.
In the latest filing by plaintiffs Alex Morgan, Megan Rapinoe and other women’s team members, they allege the serious pay discrepancies that continue to exist between the men’s and women’s teams.
Specifically, members of the women’s team can potentially earn a maximum of $99,000 a year, while members of the men’s team earn an average of $263,320 per year. Other disparities include the U.S. Soccer Federation only providing charter air flights to the men’s team in 2017, but requiring the women’s team to take commercial air flights.
The reason why this case is so newsworthy is the fact that the women’s team has been out performing the men’s team in rankings and World Cup wins for a long time. The women’s team has been ranked number one in the world for 10 of the past 11 years. Also, in more recent years, the women’s team has been outperforming the men’s team in revenue and profits as well, and in viewership. For instance, the 2019 Women’s Cup Final viewership was 22% higher than the 2018 Men’s Cup Final.
While the Soccer Federation has claimed market considerations as the reason for paying the men’s team more, the women’s team, according to the complaint, has started to outperform the men’s soccer team in revenue and profit in the most recent accounts. Additionally, according to the complaint, the women’s team had even proposed a revenue-sharing agreement where women’s player compensation would be less if their revenue decreased. It seems as if the U.S. Soccer Federation needs a reality check.
It is time that the U.S. Soccer Federation recognize and pay the women’s team at least the same as their male counterparts on the two national teams and provide them the same benefits. We represent employees in employment matters.
If you need assistance with a federal retirement or an employment issue, please contact our office at (703) 668-0070 or at www.berrylegal.com to schedule a consultation. Please also visit and like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/BerryBerryPllc.
Source: Arlnow.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
United States women's national soccer team • Lawsuit • Lawyer • John Berry (administrator) • Employment • Labour law • Law firm • Northern Virginia • United States federal civil service • Security clearance • Private sector • United States women's national soccer team • United States men's national soccer team • Another World (TV series) • FIFA World Cup • Netherlands • Sponsor (commercial) • Association football • Procter & Gamble • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • Hope Solo • Carli Lloyd • Economic discrimination • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • United States Soccer Federation • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • United States women's national soccer team • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • Case law • Lawsuit • United States district court • Los Angeles • United States Soccer Federation • Sexism • Alex Morgan • Megan Rapinoe • United States women's national soccer team • Soviet submarine S-99 • United States Soccer Federation • FIFA World Cup • IIHF World Ranking • Association football • Association football • Revenue sharing • Contract • United States Soccer Federation • Reality Check (Juvenile album) • United States Soccer Federation • Employee benefits • Employment • Employment • Welfare • Retirement • Employment • Facebook •