Stan Druckenmiller “God Help Us If We Get In A Recession” - 6 minutes read


Stan Druckenmiller "God Help Us If We Get In A Recession"

Well-known surveys from firms like Bank of America Merrill Lynch suggest most investors don’t expect a recession until next year at least, but Stanley Druckenmiller warned in a recent interview that some less-obvious warning signs are starting to appear. He also noted that the Federal Reserve seems to be so focused on deflation, which he calls “the boogeyman,” that officials are missing out on other signals.

In an onstage interview for the Economic Club of New York, Druckenmiller was asked about an editorial he wrote last year about interest rates in which he said the Fed would be making a policy error if it raised rates at that time. He had been urging the central bank to raise rates for the three or four years before that.

He emphasized in this week's interview that the keywords in his editorial were "for now" because he felt like December was the wrong time to raise rates, even though he thought rates were lower than they should've been by that time. He also said that often the Fed creates a deflationary bust through the very actions it took to try to avoid one.

When asked if he would raise rates, he said he would "sneak one in every time financial conditions allowed and hopefully by some point rates will be high enough that we'll have an appropriate rate for investment where people won't be doing stupid things like they have in past asset bubbles."

Druckenmiller also spoke about the credit crisis, expressing concern that corporate debt has ballooned faster than corporate profits and interest costs. He pegged corporate debt at $6 trillion in 2010 and $10 trillion now, while corporate profits grew from $1.7 trillion to $2.2 trillion cumulatively over eight years on a $4 trillion increase in debt. Additionally, he notes that while debt increased 65%, interest costs only went up 23%. He described this situation as "horrendous productivity of capital."

He also noted that increase in financial engineering with $5.7 trillion in buybacks versus $2.2 trillion in capital expenditures. He said in 2010, buybacks were 20% of capital expenditures, but they're now 55% with a "much higher stock market." He also emphasized that it isn't the companies that are innovating that are borrowing. It's old, dying retail companies that are borrowing.

"Here we are in probably the most innovative I would say economic disruptive period since the late 1800s and you hardly see any bankruptcies," he said. "Because there have been no market signals from the Fed -- this is pre the last year… -- but there's one other problem with all this. That's our government. Our government responds to market signals too, and the clowns in Washington, unless they get a signal from the bond market, they're just going to keep spending. So for the first time in history, we have massive deficits and full employment... God help us if we get in a recession," he added.

He also said he doesn't understand the Fed's "obsession" with 2% inflation. He said every deflation he has ever seen was created by an asset bubble, and he believes that right now, we are "creating a misallocation of resources and an asset bubble that could set up a deflation."

Druckenmiller also pointed out that the way the central bank is measuring inflation right now is wrong. He believes "we are in the middle of one of the great productivity shocks of the last 150 years," but government statistics don't show it. He explained that Google, Facebook and other online services are "free," so they are "mis-measured," just like inflation is.

When asked about indicators used for predicting the economy, he said he feels the best indicators are inside the stock market, especially cyclical companies like trucking and retail. These indicators show that the economy is in trouble, even though other indicators suggest all is well. For example, the retail index is down 24%, while the Russell 2000 is down 15%. The S&P Metals index Is down 20%, and all these indicators are hovering around 52-week lows. Meanwhile, other companies are trading close to their relative highs.

He emphasized that these indicators don't say we are in a recession now, but they do signal that it's time to be careful.

Druckenmiller also offered another sign that a recession may be closer than many investors realize. He said he has never seen a recession before corporate profits peaked, and profits looked bad in the first quarter. Because of where margins, labor and tariffs stand, he believes it's "inconceivable" that we haven't seen corporate profits peak, adding that we're now five months out from there.

"I am not willing to say we're going down, but I am willing to say there's a lot of warning signs out there [in the economy] that give me great caution," he said.

These signs are in addition to the more obvious signs of trade, etc.

This article first appeared on ValueWalk Premium

Source: Valuewalk.com

Powered by NewsAPI.org

Keywords:

RecessionBank of America Merrill LynchRecessionStanley DruckenmillerFederal Reserve SystemDeflationThe Boogeyman (wrestler)Economic Club of New YorkInterest rateFederal Reserve SystemPublic policyCentral bankThis Week (ABC TV series)Time (magazine)Federal Reserve SystemDeflationBusiness cycleTax rateFinanceInterest rateInvestmentEconomic bubbleCredit crunchCorporate bondProfit (accounting)InterestCorporate bondBremgarten–Dietikon railway lineDebtDebtInterestProductivityFinancial engineeringStock marketCompanyInnovationRetailCompanyDebtInnovationEconomyDisruptive innovationBankruptcyMarket (economics)Military communicationsBond marketGovernment budget balanceFull employmentRecessionFederal Reserve SystemInflationDeflationEconomic bubbleAssetEconomic bubbleDeflationCentral bankInflationProductivityGoogleFacebookManagement information systemInflationEconomic indicatorEconomyEconomic indicatorStock marketBusiness cycleCompanyRetailEconomic indicatorEconomyEconomic indicatorRetailStock market indexRussell 2000 IndexRecessionRecessionRecessionProfit (accounting)Profit (accounting)Labour economicsTariffCorporation