+++lead-in-text

On Friday, July 29, an auctioneer at Sotheby’s in New York brought the hammer down on a piece of sporting history: a flying volley by the Barcelona icon Johann Cruyff in a game against Atletico Madrid in December 1973.

+++

Moments like these used to exist largely in collective memory, handed down in “I was there” anecdotes, maybe dredged up for a YouTube highlights reel or a talking head documentary in some graveyard slot on Sky Sports. Today, though, they’re being commodified—chopped up, dressed up, and sold to the highest bidder. They are, inevitably, being turned into fell particularly hard for non-fungible tokens and, as they boomed and busted over the past 18 months, thousands of fans were sucked into dubious projects endorsed by footballers. At the same time, in an advertising market flattened by blockchain companies swooped in to sponsor big teams and events. This season, superstars Lionel Messi and Neymar will walk out for Paris Saint-Germain with “Crypto.com” emblazoned on their shirts. The implication is clear: Buy in, hold on, and you could be as rich as your heroes.

The truth has been quite different. The Athletic’s Joey D’Urso has detailed of player and club-endorsed crypto projects tanking in value as the cryptocurrency market has collapsed. The “[Ape Kids Football by England footballer John Terry—was a particularly egregious example. It launched with a flimsy backstory (“In a magical world where apes ruled the metaverse …”) and a series of 6,000 cartoon monkeys in soccer kits, which had to be quickly rolled back when it transpired that the project didn’t have the rights to use any of the club trademarks. After launch, the price collapsed from an average of $656 to just $65. Players who had hyped up the NFTs quietly deleted their social media posts.

Today, Ape Kids Football Club has been rebranded as “Inter Meta FC,” but the project’s Discord channel is a ghost town. A handful of owners pester the organizers about when they’re going to see a return on their investment; recently there was an earnest discussion on how best to target the upcoming World Cup in Qatar as a way to rekindle interest and drive up the value of their NFTs.

As the new club season begins, the spread of NFTs and cryptocurrency within soccer shows no signs of slowing down. Italy’s Serie A and La Liga recently signed to sell digital collectibles of in-game action, and the English FA is looking for partners for NFT projects for its national teams. At Sotheby’s, a “[digital of the Cruyff goal sold for $550,000. (He hangs in the air, frozen in time and dripping with virtual gold—no prizes for subtlety here.)

It’s hard not to be cynical. Soccer’s global appeal, the demographics of its fan base, and the money swilling around the game have always made it a magnet for the get-rich quick scheme, from the gambling sponsorships to the FX apps that promised to make foreign currency trading so easy you could do it down the pub, to platforms like FootballIndex, where you could buy and sell shares in players and collect dividends depending on how they performed. (It collapsed in March 2021, taking £90 million—more than $100 million—of people’s money with it.) With restrictions on gambling advertising in sport being in the British parliament, a tidal wave of crypto firms are ready to rush in and fill the space.

+++lead-in-text

It all began with honest enough intentions. In 2017, before Beeple and the Bored Ape Yacht Club, back when the term NFT meant nothing to most people, French entrepreneur Nicolas Julia founded a company called Sorare. It’s a digital fantasy football game: You can buy cards representing real-world players, and pit them against one another in a variety of ways to win real-world cash—part fantasy sports, part Magic the Gathering, part FIFA Ultimate Team on the blockchain. The words *non-fungible token* appeared nowhere in Sorare’s promotional material. “I really consider this not a space or a market, but a technology,” says Julia. “My aim is to build the biggest entertainment company in the world of sports, and it just happens that NFTs are the right vehicle.”

+++

Julia says he put Sorare on the blockchain because he wanted to give users ownership over their digital assets: the ability to trade them and sell them, but also to port them to other games if they wanted to. Others have used the blockchain to promise unprecedented access and money-can’t-buy experiences. Like, for example, Socios.com, which launched in early 2018 and allows clubs to sell “fan tokens” to their supporters.

In exchange for buying in, they’re usually promised a greater say in how their team is run, although in practice this has often meant a vote on trivialities like what music the team runs out to, or which soft drinks are sold at halftime. In Crawley Town—an English club owned by a crypto-funded American consortium—signed midfielder Jayden Davis after fans and NFT holders voted that midfield was where they wanted to see the squad strengthened (a victory for decentralized democracy cheapened slightly by the fact the club also signed a defender and a forward at the same time anyway).

Because fan tokens are usually pegged to Bitcoin, their value has [fluctuated and in the race for cash, clubs haven’t always done a good job of educating their supporters about the risks. Arsenal—whose fan token has dropped more than 80 percent in value since launch—was censured by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority, which found that the club “trivialized investment in crypto-assets and took advantage of consumers’ inexperience or credulity.”

Everything changed after the success of “profile picture projects” like the Bored Ape Yacht Club. “When you actually look at projects that have been launched across football, most of them are just these PFP images with nothing really behind them,” says Tim Mangnall, CEO of sports-focused NFT agency Capital Block, which has worked with Turkish clubs Galatasaray and Trabzonspor, as well as AS Monaco and Legia Warsaw. “Last year is when it really started to kick off,” he says. “It was just money being pumped in, and it was an unrealistic growth that we saw. Now we’re back to reality and a lot of these projects are cutting budgets and firing people.”

Initially, soccer-based NFT projects at least pretended to be offering something tangible: meet-and-greets with players, match tickets, access to exclusive content. As the market boomed, it became a world of vaporware and rug pulls. “When you bought trading cards or baseball cards back in the day, you didn’t know it was going to rise to the extent it did, but you bought it for the love of it,” says Mangnall. “Too many people now are trying to build their whole campaign around the speculative price, and obviously the world doesn’t really work like that.”

When he speaks to clubs across Europe who want to launch NFTs, their primary concern is money. “The number one thing is, ‘Oh, we want to make millions of pounds overnight,’” Mangnall says. “There’s a real problem in the industry because there’s a miseducation, and there’s a misunderstanding in the market of what an NFT is. It could be membership, it can be rewards, it can be something as simple as a ticket. It’s not about these big revenues.”

Everything is backwards. NFTs and the blockchain are infrastructure, not investments—buying an expensive digital asset because it’s an NFT is like rushing to buy your team’s new kit because you can pay by Visa, or because it’s delivered by DHL. “I think one big misunderstanding has been to frame NFTs as a space, a market, or a category, and it’s not. It’s just a technology,” says Julia. “When you have a booming technology like this, it attracts people who are here for the wrong reasons, who are not thinking long-term. It’s bad for the fans.”

It’s the utility that matters, and that’s something that’s been sadly forgotten in the scramble to speculate. “You’re not getting that from the football clubs because the football clubs do not realize the level of work that goes into it,” says Mangnall. “It is a product, at the end of the day, that you’re selling to your fans. Treat your fans like fans. Don’t treat them like consumers.”

Early blockchain-based sports projects like Sorare worked hard to abstract away the complexity of the crypto world: You could pay by credit card, without a care for secure wallets and gas fees. Some of the newer projects make little effort to do that—almost as if the only reason they exist is to draw the vast community of soccer fans into the crypto world, to keep the liquidity flowing, to stop the bottom falling out.

+++lead-in-text

Given the complexity of the crypto market—the wildly fluctuating cost of doing business on Ethereum, the risks of being scammed either by hackers or by the people who are actually selling you the NFT in the first place—you have to wonder whether it’s worth the headache. Ask the founders of blockchain-based sports projects why the utility they’re offering couldn’t simply be served with a member’s area on a website, accessed via an email address and password, and the answers are predictable. \
\
“Blockchain allows for true ownership in ways the Web2 platforms cannot,” says Jorge Urrutia del Pozo, head of football at Dapper Labs, which runs hugely successful partnerships with the [NBA](https://nbatopshot.com/) and has signed deals with Spain’s La Liga, the German Bundesliga, and Italy’s Serie A to launch digital collectibles. “It allows for fans to trace and verify the authenticity and scarcity of their digital collectibles, and to unlock experiences that have previously been unattainable in other environments.”

+++

Maybe we’ll get there. There is a world where the blockchain empowers greater levels of “fan engagement”—where supporters happily trade digital assets that unlock authentic experiences which bring them closer to their clubs. “There was a speculative phase. We feel like it’s more organic and healthy now,” says Michael Bouhanna, co-head of digital art sales at Sotheby’s, who helped launch the Barcelona NFT project, as well as one for Liverpool FC.

Outfits like Sorare and Dapper Labs seem the most likely to get there—but success might rest on how well they can distance themselves from the frenzy of the last 18 months. (Dapper Labs has gone as far as building its own blockchain, called Flow, to shield itself from the vagaries of Ethereum.) “The projects that will succeed are the projects that think very long-term about utility and what’s best for the fans, as opposed to thinking short-term and in an opportunistic way,” says Julia.

But soccer clubs have never been good at long-term planning, and fans—already tired of being treated like ATMs by billionaire-backed clubs—are starting to turn against NFTs. New NFT drops are met with a flurry of angry comments. Recent launches by Liverpool and Paris Saint-Germain saw thousands of NFTs going unsold. Even the club-backed projects are often marked by shambolic episodes. While lurking on the Discord of the LFC Heroes project, I saw one such incident [play out in real as users discovered that a special NFT (a gold coin, obviously) that was meant to be exclusively for certain people could be accessed by anyone via a loophole. \
\
“NFTs have a really bad PR rep in the market,” says Julia. The speculators have vanished, leaving vultures to sift through the wasteland of cartoon apes and trading cards and illustrations of Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp wearing funky hats, in the hope that their value might one day rise again.

But still the NFTs keep coming—and it’s easy to see why. The Cruyff sculpture, called *In A Way Immortal*, is the first in a series of 10 that Barcelona has planned. The club is $1.3 billion in debt, and just made $550,000 in exchange for a digital artwork and the right to hand over the match ball before a friendly match. \
\
Whether the person who dropped half a million dollars on it owns that moment in any real sense is a different question—a version of the same question fans have been grappling with for decades as they’ve seen community institutions being commandeered by reputation-laundering Russians or Saudi soft power, colors chosen by the factory workers of England plastered in logos for conglomerates that prey on the vulnerable, and ticket prices rise as games are broadcast on a streaming service run by a company that crushes labor rights.\
\
Maybe the commodification of memories themselves stings so much because they’re the one thing left in the sport that fans thought couldn’t be sold. Maybe they’re right. Long after the servers die and the digital sculpture *In A Way Immortal* quietly disappears, the memories and stories of Cruyff’s iconic goal will still exist—collective, cherished, and commerce-free. Non-fungible, in a way.

Source: Wired

Powered by NewsAPI.org